View Full Version : DHP Financial Post of the week: Investments to stay away from ?
imported_Gman
11-19-2003, 02:00 PM
Mutual funds that have loads on them. A load is an up front commission that you pay for each dollar invested in a fund. Loads can be as high as %7 on some funds. This means that this fund has to go up at least 7% for you to break even. It has been shown that Mutual funds that don't have loads on them perform just as well. Note that the load is different from the yearly management fees that you pay every year.
imported_Gman
11-19-2003, 02:12 PM
Do you have a Variable Annuity ? These are usually offered thru an insurance company. They generally have high commissions, high management fees and additional expenses like "Mortality and risk" expense (what the fuck is that?). Also if you want to get out of the annuity within the first 5-7 years they have surrender charges upwards of 7% graemlins/jpshakehead.gif
Mack-Williams
11-19-2003, 02:34 PM
Mortality is what insurance companies use to estimate when you will die with in a certain age group. In Varible Annuity the owner of the Annuity takes all the risk not the insurance carrier. I just became a licensed agent, so if you need insurance yall bet not go anywhere else.
[ November 19, 2003, 02:39 PM: Message edited by: Mack-Williams ]
imported_Gman
11-19-2003, 02:48 PM
Originally posted by Mack-Williams:
Mortality is what insurance companies use to estimate when you will die with in a certain age group. In Varible Annuity the owner of the Annuity takes all the risk not the insurance carrier. I just became a licensed agent, so if you need insurance yall bet not go anywhere else. So whats in it for me ? explain
-G
Mack-Williams
11-19-2003, 02:54 PM
Originally posted by Gman:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Mack-Williams:
Mortality is what insurance companies use to estimate when you will die with in a certain age group. In Varible Annuity the owner of the Annuity takes all the risk not the insurance carrier. I just became a licensed agent, so if you need insurance yall bet not go anywhere else. So whats in it for me ? explain
-G </font>[/QUOTE]I will try to get you the cheapest and the policy that will fit your needs. Now what is your Net Worth.
imported_Gman
11-19-2003, 02:57 PM
Originally posted by Mack-Williams:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Gman:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Mack-Williams:
Mortality is what insurance companies use to estimate when you will die with in a certain age group. In Varible Annuity the owner of the Annuity takes all the risk not the insurance carrier. I just became a licensed agent, so if you need insurance yall bet not go anywhere else. So whats in it for me ? explain
-G </font>[/QUOTE]I will try to get you the cheapest and the policy that will fit your needs. Now what is your Net Worth. </font>[/QUOTE]No, what I meant was variable annuities suck as investment instruments. Can you convince me otherwise ? graemlins/biglaugha.gif
Mack-Williams
11-19-2003, 03:03 PM
Variable Annuities suck some of the times because folks don't know what they are doing when it comes to investing. In a Variable annuity you make all the decisions on what you want you investments to go in. With that is certain risk, like the fluctuation in the stock market. Now if you know what you are doing it might work out a little better for you. If you don't know what you are doing I would recommend a fixed annuity. The carrier takes all the risk and they aren't too aggressive when it comes to investing. Oh by the way I can't even sell those until I get a securites license, but I can do fixed annuities.
[ November 19, 2003, 03:05 PM: Message edited by: Mack-Williams ]
Leslie
11-19-2003, 03:05 PM
Originally posted by Mack-Williams:
Variable Annuities suck some of the times because folks don't know what they are doing when it comes to investing. In a Variable annuity you make all the decisions on what you want you investments to go in. With that is certain risk, like the fluctuation in the stock market. Now if you know what you are doing it might work out a little better for you. If you don't know what you are doing I would recommend a fixed annuity. The carrier takes all the risk and they aren't too aggressive when it comes to investing. This is all very true, I have actually done pretty well with mine, but I am always looking at my monthly statements to see how my choice of funds are doing. You can also take a very conservative approach and for instance just stay in bonds for the most part. But I also agree with your suggestion about opting for a fixed annuity if one decides to go the annuity route at all.
imported_Gman
11-19-2003, 03:09 PM
Originally posted by Mack-Williams:
Variable Annuities suck some of the times because folks don't know what they are doing when it comes to investing. In a Variable annuity you make all the decisions on what you want you investments to go in. With that is certain risk, like the fluctuation in the stock market. Now if you know what you are doing it might work out a little better for you. If you don't know what you are doing I would recommend a fixed annuity. The carrier takes all the risk and they aren't too aggressive when it comes to investing. Mack how much is your commission ? What are the average yearly managment fee's for some of company's funds ? Why should I pay a mortality expense ?
-G
Mack-Williams
11-19-2003, 03:20 PM
Originally posted by Gman:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Mack-Williams:
Variable Annuities suck some of the times because folks don't know what they are doing when it comes to investing. In a Variable annuity you make all the decisions on what you want you investments to go in. With that is certain risk, like the fluctuation in the stock market. Now if you know what you are doing it might work out a little better for you. If you don't know what you are doing I would recommend a fixed annuity. The carrier takes all the risk and they aren't too aggressive when it comes to investing. Mack how much is your commission ? What are the average yearly managment fee's for some of company's funds ? Why should I pay a mortality expense ?
-G </font>[/QUOTE]G I am at a insurance brokerage, so I am the middle man. I will make money of the intial premium. That is no extra fee to you. Also, most of annuities we offer don't have mortiality cost. You might have small administative fees. Only thing about annuities most have surrender charges, so if you want to opt out of the annuity early will have to pay a fee. They are listed in policy and illustrations that you would have to look over.
imported_Gman
11-19-2003, 03:37 PM
Originally posted by Mack-Williams:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Gman:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Mack-Williams:
Variable Annuities suck some of the times because folks don't know what they are doing when it comes to investing. In a Variable annuity you make all the decisions on what you want you investments to go in. With that is certain risk, like the fluctuation in the stock market. Now if you know what you are doing it might work out a little better for you. If you don't know what you are doing I would recommend a fixed annuity. The carrier takes all the risk and they aren't too aggressive when it comes to investing. Mack how much is your commission ? What are the average yearly managment fee's for some of company's funds ? Why should I pay a mortality expense ?
-G </font>[/QUOTE]G I am at a insurance brokerage, so I am the middle man. I will make money of the intial premium. That is no extra fee to you. Also, most of annuities we offer don't have mortiality cost. You might have small administative fees. Only thing about annuities most have surrender charges, so if you want to opt out of the annuity early will have to pay a fee. They are listed in policy and illustrations that you would have to look over. </font>[/QUOTE]So I would not have to pay a load to put money in the fund?
Also you say "small" administrative fee. Exactly how small is that ? .5%, 1%, 3% ?
What I am getting at is that in order to compare investments I have to know all the charges\fees involved in investing in that particular annuity.
In general we all should know what we are paying in expenses and fees to invest our money in a particular instrument. If you don't know then you should find out.
-G
Mack-Williams
11-19-2003, 03:44 PM
No load to put in the fund just the amount you pay to start the annuity. The adminstrative cost differs from each anniuty or insurance policy. Like term insurance doesn't have any admistrive fees, but whole and universal life does because of the investing the insurance carrier does. Most are around $60 to $70 per year. For annuity the fee comes in the first year only.
Bernie
11-19-2003, 04:14 PM
Originally posted by Gman:
Mutual funds that have loads on them. A load is an up front commission that you pay for each dollar invested in a fund. Loads can be as high as %7 on some funds. This means that this fund has to go up at least 7% for you to break even. It has been shown that Mutual funds that don't have loads on them perform just as well. Note that the load is different from the yearly management fees that you pay every year. Also stay away from mutual funds with high expense ratio (the industry average is 1.36% of the fund balance--there are funds with much lower ratios than that), or has other fees like 12b-1 (often used to pay for advertising the fund).
These costs can cost you thousands of dollars over a investment time of 30 - 40 years. Also, watch out for index funds that are not really index funds (wolves in sheep's clothing). These funds can include sales loads, 12b-1 fees, and high expense ratios. Index funds can be had with an expense ratio as low as 0.18%, no 12b-1 fee, and an initial investment of as little as $1,000.
Just some thoughts,
music
11-19-2003, 05:33 PM
do you recommend whole life insurance?
Mack-Williams
11-19-2003, 05:46 PM
Originally posted by music:
do you recommend whole life insurance? Universal Life.
imported_Gman
11-19-2003, 06:15 PM
Originally posted by music:
do you recommend whole life insurance? I currently have my life insurance thru my job so I pay very little for the coverage. It is equivalent to Term Insurance.
From what I understand Term Life Insurance is the way to go. I'll post an article that explains the difference between Term and Whole/Universal/variable Life but the bottom line is you are going to pay significantly more for the same coverage under Whole/Universal/variable Life than under Term.
-G
[ November 19, 2003, 06:17 PM: Message edited by: Gman ]
Mack-Williams
11-19-2003, 06:23 PM
Originally posted by Gman:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by music:
do you recommend whole life insurance? I currently have my life insurance thru my job so I pay very little for the coverage. It is equivalent to Term Insurance.
From what I understand Term Life Insurance is the way to go. I'll post an article that explains the difference between Term and Whole/Universal/variable Life but the bottom line is you are going to pay significantly more for the same coverage under Whole/Universal/variable Life than under Term.
-G </font>[/QUOTE]True. I was saying universal life is better if you are going with permanent insurance.
imported_Gman
11-19-2003, 06:41 PM
Originally posted by Bernie:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Gman:
Mutual funds that have loads on them. A load is an up front commission that you pay for each dollar invested in a fund. Loads can be as high as %7 on some funds. This means that this fund has to go up at least 7% for you to break even. It has been shown that Mutual funds that don't have loads on them perform just as well. Note that the load is different from the yearly management fees that you pay every year. Also stay away from mutual funds with high expense ratio (the industry average is 1.36% of the fund balance--there are funds with much lower ratios than that), or has other fees like 12b-1 (often used to pay for advertising the fund).
These costs can cost you thousands of dollars over a investment time of 30 - 40 years. Also, watch out for index funds that are not really index funds (wolves in sheep's clothing). These funds can include sales loads, 12b-1 fees, and high expense ratios. Index funds can be had with an expense ratio as low as 0.18%, no 12b-1 fee, and an initial investment of as little as $1,000.
Just some thoughts, </font>[/QUOTE]Vanguard's expense ratios are some of the lowest in the industy.
-G
Bernie
11-19-2003, 08:01 PM
Originally posted by Gman:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Bernie:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Gman:
Mutual funds that have loads on them. A load is an up front commission that you pay for each dollar invested in a fund. Loads can be as high as %7 on some funds. This means that this fund has to go up at least 7% for you to break even. It has been shown that Mutual funds that don't have loads on them perform just as well. Note that the load is different from the yearly management fees that you pay every year. Also stay away from mutual funds with high expense ratio (the industry average is 1.36% of the fund balance--there are funds with much lower ratios than that), or has other fees like 12b-1 (often used to pay for advertising the fund).
These costs can cost you thousands of dollars over a investment time of 30 - 40 years. Also, watch out for index funds that are not really index funds (wolves in sheep's clothing). These funds can include sales loads, 12b-1 fees, and high expense ratios. Index funds can be had with an expense ratio as low as 0.18%, no 12b-1 fee, and an initial investment of as little as $1,000.
Just some thoughts, </font>[/QUOTE]Vanguard's expense ratios are some of the lowest in the industy.
-G </font>[/QUOTE]Yes indeed!!! graemlins/thumbsup.gif
imported_Gman
11-19-2003, 08:20 PM
Originally posted by Gman:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by music:
do you recommend whole life insurance? I currently have my life insurance thru my job so I pay very little for the coverage. It is equivalent to Term Insurance.
From what I understand Term Life Insurance is the way to go. I'll post an article that explains the difference between Term and Whole/Universal/variable Life but the bottom line is you are going to pay significantly more for the same coverage under Whole/Universal/variable Life than under Term.
-G </font>[/QUOTE]Author Eric Tyson:
http://deephousepage.com/jpegs/insure1.jpg
http://deephousepage.com/jpegs/insure2.jpg
imported_Gman
11-20-2003, 08:20 AM
Originally posted by music:
do you recommend whole life insurance? ^Bump for Music.
julian_kelly
11-20-2003, 12:23 PM
I stay away from anything that I cant control to a great degree. I dont buy stuff and hope it makes me money...'buying and hoping' is gambling...a crap shoot...suicide...I dont gamble with my livelihood. I need to have a great degree of assurance that it will make me loot. The chance for loss is always there, but if I cant stack the odds in my favor from knowledge I acquire and the people I surround myself with, I dont fool with it.
I stay away from stuff I have to guess at.
I stay away from stuff I dont understand.
I stay away from stuff that is managed by people that I dont know....or people who have a bad track record. I need to know who the jockey riding the horse is and how successful they have been; as well as their strategies and their plans for the future. (i.e, folk invest in a mutual fund and dont even know the name of the fund manager or his or her track record....not good)
I maily stay away from mutual funds. I have two...dont really care for them, but I ususally stay away from them.
I try as hard as I can to stay away from stuff that gives me less than 10% yearly return. (Exception = bonds)
I often stay away from stuff that doesnt give me immediate income. (Immediate = less than 1 year...preferably weekely or monthly) I do buy long term stuff, but I mainly focus on making cash now so Ill have more later.
I stay away from stuff that isnt liquid. I need to know I can sell it immediately if need be with preferable tax treatment.
I try to stay away from stuff that isnt residual.
I stay away from stuff I have to watch/manage all the time.
julian kelly
imported_Gman
11-20-2003, 02:44 PM
Originally posted by julian_kelly:
I maily stay away from mutual funds. I have two...dont really care for them, but I ususally stay away from them.
julian kelly You prefer individual stocks or Mutual Funds don't make you enough money fast enough ?
-G
C hristian
11-20-2003, 02:57 PM
The more I read my book "The Soul of Capitalism" (PICK IT UP! It's SCIENCE!) The more I agree with Warren Buffet: Don't invest in investment/company you don't completely understand.
or was that Julian Kelly of Omaha, Nebraska?
imported_Gman
11-20-2003, 03:19 PM
Originally posted by C hristian:
The more I read my book "The Soul of Capitalism" (PICK IT UP! It's SCIENCE!) The more I agree with Warren Buffet: Don't invest in investment/company you don't completely understand.
or was that Julian Kelly of Omaha, Nebraska? Thanks for the recommendation. Anytime you invest in something that you don't completely understand you can almost be assured that you will be taken advantage of. Take the time to get the knowledge (I need to follow my own advice smile.gif ) .
Some people don't realize the financial planner\advisor they have been going to all along is really a salesperson. I have friends who are investing thousands of dollars a month in their retirement plans and they have no clue as to the fees and expenses associated with the investment. When I ask them to find out how much the company is charging them to invest their money they say things like "I want my money to work for me I don't want to work for my money". They so trust the financial planner (salesperson) at these companies its rediculous.
-G
C hristian
11-20-2003, 04:38 PM
correct. all those full service financial companies are a scam. they get investments from the big companies, and then go out selling to you, the little fish. We know what happens to the little fish in a sea of sharks when they are unaware!
Gotta go with the discount brokerage firms, if any!
julian_kelly
11-20-2003, 04:43 PM
Mutual funds definitely have their place in investing. Many people have been smart with them and made tons of cash. You can make money with funds over the long term, but you have to play a role in monitoring them. Buy, hold and pray isnt a strategy.
To have or not have funds depends on what youre trying to accomplish and how much you want to be active in managing your money. For some folk its a good thing, for some it isnt...kinda like apples and oranges.
My dislike of mutual funds is in relation to using them as the ONLY source of retirement (i.e, 401k), but I have no problems with them if they are used with other instruments suck as individual stocks, real estate, businesses, bonds, other money making ways, etc. to encompass a COMPLETE system for building wealth.
I dont care too much for mutual funds for several reasons:
1. You often get taxed on them unfavorably.
If a fund manager sells shares, the gains are passed down to the people who buy them and they are taxed...even if you dont sell your shares.
2. You often cant touch the money.
To really have success in a fund, you have to leave it in there and wait for it to grow. To me this is like watching paint dry.
Access to the money in mutual funds isnt flexible....you cant take it out or put it in something else without extreme fees and penalties.
3. Fund managers change too often.
The real way to pick a mutual fund is on the reputation of the fund manager and his team. Folk often follow a particular fund, name, company or past track record instead of the fund manager. For example, Stock fund A with 'superstar trader Mr. Jones' managing it may make 18% in one year, but on the low, Mr. Jones is consistently gettin more lucrative offers from other fund companies. Mr. Jones will go to 'greener pastures' and manage another fund without the the shareowners even knowing (unless you read the quarterly or annual report or keep up with businesss topics)
Stock fund A goes out and hires a new fund manager who isnt as good as Mr. Jones, but without knowing of this change, you still have a lot of money vested in this fund.
It similar to spending a lot of money buying a team with Jordan as your star player. He scores 30 for two years straight, but disappears and youre wonderin next year why the team isnt doint as good. The team brings in a player who only averages 15 a game (and you dont know it.) You have your money invested in the fund, but the key player is gone. Manager turnover in funds is often high in mutual funds.
4. Youre at the mercy of the fund manager.
What ever decisions he makes goes.
5. Many funds dont hold stocks as advertised.
A fund may be a 'telecom fund' but hold stocks that arent telecom stocks. People would be surprised to find out that sometimes many funds hold and trade the same popular stocks at one time or another. Fund mangers are under tremendous pressure to excel and meet returns for shareholders. If the stocks a manager picks arent up to snuff, the manager may dump tons of stock and buy 'whatever is hot' in order to meet strick demands - thus making the fund you invested in not really getting the flava you thought you were getting.
6. Many funds arent regulated or monitored much
....anybody can open up one....read the Wall Street Journal, Investors Business Daily and the busienss section of the papers from the past month or so. Mutual funds are coming under huge scrutiny.
7. Funds are tied to the market directly (in a sense) but offer little flexiblility in terms of taking advantage of the ups and downs of the market.
For example, if the Dow or S&P are up or down, most funds will be up or down (but there are exceptions.) Because of the nature of funds, its difficult to take advantage of the ups and downs of the market...if the market is up you make cash...if its down, you dont.
With individual stocks, if the market is down, you can short the market and make $$...if the market is up, you can go long and make $$. With options, you can make money whether the market goes up, down or sideways. You can make money in real estate if interest rates are up or down. You can make money in owning a business if the market is up or down. You can make residual income in concerns/businesses that pay royalties, copywrights, licensing, etc. whether the market is up or down.
You can buy mutual fund shares at a discount when the market is down as well as sell them and cut loses if you wish, but there arent too many other ways to take advantage of market volatility.
8. It's difficult to leverage mutual funds.
Leverage in building wealth is a key concept...it simply means achieving more with less....a lot with less....a lot with nothing.
For example, in business, you can do more work and make more money using the efforts of employees, independent contractors, advisors, etc., in addition to yourself. A buseinss that has a superior system can operate on its onwn. A boss of a true business can take off and still make money if he stops working....thats leverage.
In real estate, you can control real estate with no money...control $10 mill in property with $1million....control $100 of real estate with $10k or less...thats leverage.
With individual stocks, you can take advantage of margin and buy 1,2 times as much stock with the amount of funds you have if youre qualified enough and knowledgable to do so...thats leverage.
With options/commodities/derivatives, you can own hundreds of shares of derivatives with less money than the value.
The only people reeaaally utilizing leverage with mutual funds are the fund managers and fund owners. They are taking millions of folks money FOR FREE and making money off of it graemlins/rofl.gif Now thats a true no money deal graemlins/rofl.gif
9. Protecting against loses.
Most folk who have mutual funds (especially thru a 401k) buy and hold them and never sell to stop losses. Theres nothing wrong with protecting your principal investment and taking a loss to stop the bleeding. The media and 'financial planners' always harp that you should hold your investments, but the wealthy and educated have no problem with cuting losses (in a calculated manner) and getting in the game again; neverthelsess, most buy, hold and pray.
Therefore, when their funds in a 401k take a hit, they have to wait the downtime out. In a sense, mutual funds have no 'insurace' against loss.
You can buy options to protect stock losses. You can buy insurance to protect your real estate and businesses. If you lose your 401k...there isnt much protection (see Enron)
10. Mutual funds make you lazy.
Most folk who invest in funds do so blindly and dont know anything about the fund or managers. They 'trust' that somebody they dont know will make them rich and help with their retirement. Thats a crap shoot to me.
11. If your timing is bad, youre screwed.
Its hard to predict when the market will crash...WHEN (not if) the market crashes and your funds and/or 401k loose the majority of its value (if its one year before your retirement), you dont have another 30 years to wait for a redwood tree to grow again. We see stories on tv all the time about folk who lost all they had due to a market crash. I prefer instruments where you can make money when the market crashes.
12. Its hard to make money with mutual funds in the short term.
Say you need $5k to prevent foreclosure of your home in two months or you need $20k to send your kid to college in two years...or even a quick $1,000 in a week, investing in a mutual fund traditionally wont get you the money you need quick.
There are advantages to having funds, but I would only use them as ONE piece of a puzzle and NOT the entire puzzle. I would suggest devising a money making sytem that has more than one piece.
julian kelly
Originally posted by Gman:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by julian_kelly:
I maily stay away from mutual funds. I have two...dont really care for them, but I ususally stay away from them.
julian kelly You prefer individual stocks or Mutual Funds don't make you enough money fast enough ?
-G </font>[/QUOTE]
[ November 20, 2003, 04:55 PM: Message edited by: julian_kelly ]
imported_Gman
11-20-2003, 05:20 PM
Originally posted by julian_kelly:
Mutual funds definitely have their place in investing. Many people have been smart with them and made tons of cash. You can make money with funds over the long term, but you have to play a role in monitoring them. Buy, hold and pray isnt a strategy.
To have or not have funds depends on what youre trying to accomplish and how much you want to be active in managing your money. For some folk its a good thing, for some it isnt...kinda like apples and oranges.
My dislike of mutual funds is in relation to using them as the ONLY source of retirement (i.e, 401k), but I have no problems with them if they are used with other instruments suck as individual stocks, real estate, businesses, bonds, other money making ways, etc. to encompass a COMPLETE system for building wealth.
I dont care too much for mutual funds for several reasons:
1. You often get taxed on them unfavorably.
If a fund manager sells shares, the gains are passed down to the people who buy them and they are taxed...even if you dont sell your shares.
2. You often cant touch the money.
To really have success in a fund, you have to leave it in there and wait for it to grow. To me this is like watching paint dry.
Access to the money in mutual funds isnt flexible....you cant take it out or put it in something else without extreme fees and penalties.
3. Fund managers change too often.
The real way to pick a mutual fund is on the reputation of the fund manager and his team. Folk often follow a particular fund, name, company or past track record instead of the fund manager. For example, Stock fund A with 'superstar trader Mr. Jones' managing it may make 18% in one year, but on the low, Mr. Jones is consistently gettin more lucrative offers from other fund companies. Mr. Jones will go to 'greener pastures' and manage another fund without the the shareowners even knowing (unless you read the quarterly or annual report or keep up with businesss topics)
Stock fund A goes out and hires a new fund manager who isnt as good as Mr. Jones, but without knowing of this change, you still have a lot of money vested in this fund.
It similar to spending a lot of money buying a team with Jordan as your star player. He scores 30 for two years straight, but disappears and youre wonderin next year why the team isnt doint as good. The team brings in a player who only averages 15 a game (and you dont know it.) You have your money invested in the fund, but the key player is gone. Manager turnover in funds is often high in mutual funds.
4. Youre at the mercy of the fund manager.
What ever decisions he makes goes.
5. Many funds dont hold stocks as advertised.
A fund may be a 'telecom fund' but hold stocks that arent telecom stocks. People would be surprised to find out that sometimes many funds hold and trade the same popular stocks at one time or another. Fund mangers are under tremendous pressure to excel and meet returns for shareholders. If the stocks a manager picks arent up to snuff, the manager may dump tons of stock and buy 'whatever is hot' in order to meet strick demands - thus making the fund you invested in not really getting the flava you thought you were getting.
6. Many funds arent regulated or monitored much
....anybody can open up one....read the Wall Street Journal, Investors Business Daily and the busienss section of the papers from the past month or so. Mutual funds are coming under huge scrutiny.
7. Funds are tied to the market directly (in a sense) but offer little flexiblility in terms of taking advantage of the ups and downs of the market.
For example, if the Dow or S&P are up or down, most funds will be up or down (but there are exceptions.) Because of the nature of funds, its difficult to take advantage of the ups and downs of the market...if the market is up you make cash...if its down, you dont.
With individual stocks, if the market is down, you can short the market and make $$...if the market is up, you can go long and make $$. With options, you can make money whether the market goes up, down or sideways. You can make money in real estate if interest rates are up or down. You can make money in owning a business if the market is up or down. You can make residual income in concerns/businesses that pay royalties, copywrights, licensing, etc. whether the market is up or down.
You can buy mutual fund shares at a discount when the market is down as well as sell them and cut loses if you wish, but there arent too many other ways to take advantage of market volatility.
8. It's difficult to leverage mutual funds.
Leverage in building wealth is a key concept...it simply means achieving more with less....a lot with less....a lot with nothing.
For example, in business, you can do more work and make more money using the efforts of employees, independent contractors, advisors, etc., in addition to yourself. A buseinss that has a superior system can operate on its onwn. A boss of a true business can take off and still make money if he stops working....thats leverage.
In real estate, you can control real estate with no money...control $10 mill in property with $1million....control $100 of real estate with $10k or less...thats leverage.
With individual stocks, you can take advantage of margin and buy 1,2 times as much stock with the amount of funds you have if youre qualified enough and knowledgable to do so...thats leverage.
With options/commodities/derivatives, you can own hundreds of shares of derivatives with less money than the value.
The only people reeaaally utilizing leverage with mutual funds are the fund managers and fund owners. They are taking millions of folks money FOR FREE and making money off of it graemlins/rofl.gif Now thats a true no money deal graemlins/rofl.gif
9. Protecting against loses.
Most folk who have mutual funds (especially thru a 401k) buy and hold them and never sell to stop losses. Theres nothing wrong with protecting your principal investment and taking a loss to stop the bleeding. The media and 'financial planners' always harp that you should hold your investments, but the wealthy and educated have no problem with cuting losses (in a calculated manner) and getting in the game again; neverthelsess, most buy, hold and pray.
Therefore, when their funds in a 401k take a hit, they have to wait the downtime out. In a sense, mutual funds have no 'insurace' against loss.
You can buy options to protect stock losses. You can buy insurance to protect your real estate and businesses. If you lose your 401k...there isnt much protection (see Enron)
10. Mutual funds make you lazy.
Most folk who invest in funds do so blindly and dont know anything about the fund or managers. They 'trust' that somebody they dont know will make them rich and help with their retirement. Thats a crap shoot to me.
11. If your timing is bad, youre screwed.
Its hard to predict when the market will crash...WHEN (not if) the market crashes and your funds and/or 401k loose the majority of its value (if its one year before your retirement), you dont have another 30 years to wait for a redwood tree to grow again. We see stories on tv all the time about folk who lost all they had due to a market crash. I prefer instruments where you can make money when the market crashes.
12. Its hard to make money with mutual funds in the short term.
Say you need $5k to prevent foreclosure of your home in two months or you need $20k to send your kid to college in two years...or even a quick $1,000 in a week, investing in a mutual fund traditionally wont get you the money you need quick.
There are advantages to having funds, but I would only use them as ONE piece of a puzzle and NOT the entire puzzle. I would suggest devising a money making sytem that has more than one piece.
julian kelly
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Gman:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by julian_kelly:
I maily stay away from mutual funds. I have two...dont really care for them, but I ususally stay away from them.
julian kelly You prefer individual stocks or Mutual Funds don't make you enough money fast enough ?
-G </font>[/QUOTE]</font>[/QUOTE]Gotta take my time and read the above slowly. Thanks !
-G
tight post julian, bottom line, don't fuck with that which you don't understand or control
kelvy
11-21-2003, 12:11 AM
thanks Julian for providing your valuable input regarding mutual funds in the whole scheme of investing...i already copied it onto a document for my reference...this post should definetly go into the "best of"...matter of fact, there should be a "financial posts" section on this board, that would be a boon. hail.gif
the crackhouse
11-21-2003, 05:26 AM
Do not invest in :
- CELLULAR PHONES, a cheap one, no need to have a color screen, realplayer download, web access, email, camera and all... you can break it or get it stolen from you. Ask your company for one of these and use a cheap one for your personnal stuff, except if you need a special feature.
- CARS, cars are industrially made to break after a particular # of miles cruised. On some models, there are even special parts which are made to break (electric parts, engine ones or wheeling ones). You will see that some cars series have the same fragile or breaking parts after the same amount of miles. Don't buy a cheap car cause it will be a hole in your finances, but don't spend too much in a big car which is only more sophisticated, sometimes it's worth in matters of security if you drive a lot. Ask your company for one.
- HOUSE RENTING, perfer to buy your own house, even if it's a little place. When it'll be yours, you will invest your money in something else.
- FOOD, raise tomatoes, potatoes, leeks, radish on your balcony or somewhere in your house or appartment. It's easy and it'll cost you 50% of the price you buy them at the supermercado and they will have a better taste and 'll be bigger. You can be sure that they will not be full of pesticids also.
If you can't, drive some miles to the next farm and buy 20 kilos of potatoes for 1/3 of the price.
- CONDOMS, have babies, raise children !
- ALREADY COOKED FOOD, buy basic elements and cook ! You will spend more time but at least save 50% of the price and act against obesity and eat healthy...
imported_Gman
11-21-2003, 03:55 PM
Originally posted by kelvy:
thanks Julian for providing your valuable input regarding mutual funds in the whole scheme of investing...i already copied it onto a document for my reference...this post should definetly go into the "best of"...matter of fact, there should be a "financial posts" section on this board, that would be a boon. hail.gif I was definitely planning on creating a section for all the DHP financial posts.
Lincoln
11-21-2003, 05:55 PM
Also, stay away from buying records if it's not your lively hood. :(
imported_Gman
11-22-2003, 08:15 AM
Originally posted by Lincoln:
Also, stay away from buying records if it's not your lively hood. :( graemlins/biglaugha.gif
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.